Lydia (Misty Mundae) dreams about a vampire strangling (?) her -
repeatedly. In the next scene, she is about 2 years younger, has a
completely different, appalling hairdo and gained quite some extra pounds,
she phones her cousin Billy (William Hellfire) and tells him she's gonna stay
with him. Billy finds that super, and before long, the two decide to
intensify their relationship by shagging ... and eventually, Billy decides
it would be a good idea to strangle Lydia ...
Then, a satanic shaman (Joey Smack) stops by, signs up Billy for his
sect and pours something into his drink. Lydia, who now once again looks
like at the beginning of the film, has survived Billy's strangling, and it
appears it hasn't even put her off, because now she masturbates a lot.
Billy meanwhile, thanks to the potion the shaman put in his drink, has
changed into a vampire - complete with cape and everything. When Lydia
sees Billy the Vampire, she immediately wants to shag again, then she asks
him to bite her, which he does - which makes one wonder what the whole
thing has to do with Lydia's dreams about a vampire strangling her
What a bad film !
The story of the film of course totally sucks, but this could be
excused by the fact that the story as such is little more than a vehicle
for the sex scenes - but then the sex scenes are dead boring as well, and
Misty Mundae - who has proven in later films that she can both look sexy
and act, doesn't look at all good here, more like a stocky country girl with
no fashion sense and a bad hairdo left over from the 1980's. And her
acting is accordingly bad. Of course, uninspired camerawork, a serious
lack of direction and total absence of art direction don't help the film
one bit., nor do stupid dialogues and bad sound. And then, what's this
about the scenes where Misty looks totally different (and better). Could
it be that these scenes were just shot to recycle old material into a new
film ? (The answer of course is yes.)
Of course, since this is a no-budget indie production, all of the
film's flaws could be excused - but what's really annoying is that nobody
seems to m,ake the slightest effort to put any kind of quality into the
film, it just seems to go along the lines "We've got a naked girl,
the rest will fall together somehow" - which quite frankly, no it
doesn't. It's just a piece of shit, and not the good kind of shit.
By the way, this film was released in several versions, including one
hardcore version - which makes it Misty's only hardcore film (to date ?).
However, there is no actual fucking even in the hardcore version, just
lots of (unsimulated) fingering and oral sex (with Misty both giving and
receiving). The version that is out on DVD from After
Hours is the softcore version though, with the harder scenes on
the disc too but hidden away in the extras-section. However, even the
softcore version, clocking in at a mere 54 minutes, seems to go on forever
and is quite a bore.